torek, 24. maj 2011

leonardo dicaprio younger years

leonardo dicaprio younger years. leonardo dicaprio young
  • leonardo dicaprio young


  • FloatingBones
    Nov 20, 01:03 AM
    I don't need to do squat guy.

    If you don't address those very good reasons, your argument won't be very convincing. We do not want the CPU suck, the identity leaking, the UI inconsistencies, and the very real risk of "zero day" Adobe bugs.

    WTF do I care about your reasons for wanting to take away my choice to use Flash? I don't.

    In other words, you are not competent to carry on a rational discussion. You're just here to vent.

    It's not about "propping up" flash, it's about being able to access TODAY'S Internet, not hoping some day that we won't need Flash.

    Users of those 120M+ devices don't have to hope. They are already free of Flash!

    We just want to use the Internet unfettered by Steve Jobs playing the part of a Communist Dictator.

    The analogy makes no sense. Nobody is forcing you to use any Apple product.

    If you really want the "full web experience" of zero-day Adobe bugs, get an Android phone. Note: Android phones were vulnerable to the last zero-day Adobe bug. (http://www.grc.com/sn/sn-273.txt)

    The only reasons I see from you are excuses to praise Steve.

    The fact that I can't catch zero-day Adobe attacks on my iPhone is a great reason to praise Apple's decision.

    which does NOTHING to make other Flash functions work, BTW, leaving many sites useless even so

    Do tell: what exact sites are you talking about? What exact legacy flash applications are running on those sites to which you can find no substitute?

    It's a drop in the ocean compared to the world at large nor should they have to be held hostage by Steve Jobs whose sole goal in life is to get you to pay him for every little thing you do in this world.

    Nobody is holding a gun to your head. Nobody is holding you hostage.

    If you don't like the choices that Apple made, then ditch your iOS device and get an Android. Simple.

    He wants to push his warped agendas and ring every last cent out of you no matter how inconvenient it might be to you.

    This is the first little lie in your rant. The iOS users don't find it inconvenient. If Flash were so damn important to them, they would have bought some device that could run Flash.

    The people who bought those 120M+ devices disagree with you.

    He wants to force the destruction of flash by denying his customers access to a large percentage of the world's web sites all the time while lying about iOS devices being able to access the 'real' or 'full' Internet.

    This is the second little lie. Apple did provide a choice: they approved the SkyFire App. They didn't have to do that.

    Apple has also announced they will approve Flash Apps using Adobe's cross-compiler for iOS. If there actually are crucial Flash apps -- you haven't named a single specific one so far -- the owners of those apps should be able to easily cross-compile their apps for the iOS App Store.

    if you don't have Flash, you don't have the full Internet.

    And that is the third little lie. Flash is a proprietary and legacy platform. It's on the way down now.

    Even Adobe has acknowledged that a Flash-only choice is a bankrupt strategy (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1039999). After websites start offering their content with an open standard, you've gotta ask: what exactly is the value in continuing to prop up Flash?

    I just want innovative products. That is what Steve is good at. That doesn't mean I want his arrogant ego side pushing those products with restrictions that have nothing to do with the technology and only to do with Steve's need to be a control freak.

    And this is number four. If those words were true, you would be able to explain why my four huge concerns for running Flash in iOS Safari are not valid. But you can't do that!

    If the flash experience is so great, please tell us what exact Flash sites are you talking about? What exact legacy flash applications are running on those sites to which you can find no substitute on your iOS device?




    leonardo dicaprio younger years. Leonardo DiCaprio
  • Leonardo DiCaprio


  • JsR
    Sep 13, 02:01 PM
    http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Business/Pix/pictures/2008/05/30/coke460.jpg




    leonardo dicaprio younger years. leonardo dicaprio younger.
  • leonardo dicaprio younger.


  • torbjoern
    May 2, 01:44 AM
    NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN! He deserved to die.
    What about those who lost their lives in 9/11? They probably deserved to live, but can you give them life back?

    Like I said - the world needed him alive, and I wish they had just captured him instead. Nothing constructive comes out of cheering over somebody else's death.

    Most of the Muslim students in my old high-school were cheering and having a great celebration after 9/11. That is the real reason why I have had problems with Muslims in general since after that day (though I must admit I was already sceptical after the Rushdie case). I know they didn't cause 9/11 by celebrating it after it had already happened... but would they have been cheering happily if I had died in a similar attack?


    But if I were in NYC today, I'd probably celebrate with the rest, be it ever so wrong. I'm only human, and I love revenge, just like everybody else :D




    leonardo dicaprio younger years. Leonardo DiCaprio: The Early
  • Leonardo DiCaprio: The Early


  • albarran9
    Jan 28, 08:05 AM
    NuForce uDAC-2 for my audio-technica ATH-M50's :D
    269122



    more...

    leonardo dicaprio younger years. Leonardo DiCaprio is being
  • Leonardo DiCaprio is being


  • vincenz
    Apr 22, 04:45 PM
    Eh? Doesn't sound right at all.




    leonardo dicaprio younger years. Leonardo+dicaprio+younger+
  • Leonardo+dicaprio+younger+


  • CalBoy
    Jan 26, 01:22 AM
    The ticker is AAPL, and it's traded on Nasdaq, not NYSE.

    Actually Nasdaq is an index, not a trading cite. The NYSE is an exchange (much like one we'd find in London, Tokyo, etc). What Apple is not listed under is the Dow 30 (commonly referred to only as "the Dow" or "Dow Jones Industrial Average"), which lists the 30 largest companies of the US based on industry and importance (current ones include WalMart, GE, CitiGroup, etc).



    more...

    leonardo dicaprio younger years. Leonardo DiCaprio blonde bangs
  • Leonardo DiCaprio blonde bangs


  • tbrinkma
    Apr 12, 11:49 AM
    I have a rare disease that tells my brain that I must have the latest and greatest... It nags at me until I obtain the newest update. I've seen doctors all over the world but none have been able to cure me :p

    Maybe you should try a newer doctor? :eek: :D :p




    leonardo dicaprio younger years. Leonardo-fuckin-DiCaprio.
  • Leonardo-fuckin-DiCaprio.


  • bennettave
    Apr 26, 03:39 PM
    The usual pattern is to get some small teaser for free ... like I got hooked on the free dropbox and now pay for the 100GB plan because I love it so much



    Yeah, a free period or small amount free would be nice in order to find out if it's something you'll continue to use after the first few weeks. Most of the apps I download only keep their flavor about 5 days. I agree that Dropbox is the bomb though. It's iDisk done right - and free to boot!



    more...

    leonardo dicaprio younger years. Leonardo DiCaprio
  • Leonardo DiCaprio


  • beangibbs
    Apr 25, 12:02 PM
    matte screen option or fail.

    Really? People downing the product already before we even know what it's going to have? Really?
    Or are there people just trolling for a response?




    leonardo dicaprio younger years. of 6 years Bar Refaelli.
  • of 6 years Bar Refaelli.


  • Reventon
    Nov 24, 01:00 PM
    Hmm. I'd say a Logitech G27 Racing Wheel and a new LCD TV to go with my GT5 game. Realistically, I'll probably get the DFGT and get a new TV only if my current CRT TV breaks.



    more...

    leonardo dicaprio younger years. DiCaprio knows how to play
  • DiCaprio knows how to play


  • timinbovey
    Apr 26, 07:01 PM
    I'm curious to know exactly WHAT "cloud" they're going to store my music in? There IS no CLOUD! Cripes, people, it's the same darn internet it always was. Piles of servers and hard drives, all connected by cables and wires and fiber optics, et. al. right here on EARTH. There's NO CLOUD. Why the HECK they had to start calling it that is what? Basically a Microsoft marketing term, right? So, lets get past that BS right now.

    Of COURSE they're going to charge for it. Do you think for a moment that Apple, or anyone else can provide storage for all the songs, videos., etc that users have on their individual devices, AND provide bandwidth for that much streaming, AND maintain it, etc for free? Be real people.

    Remembeer, the record labels are DEMANDING that EACH song by EVERY user be uploaded and kept seperate. So if 126,577 people have the SAME exact song on their device, it will have to be uploaded 126,577 times so each has their own secure copy to access. Which also makes me wonder, will Apple (or anyone else) be allowed to have backups available? Or will hundreds of thousands of users and their files have to be re-uploaded when there's a failure?

    Basically, this is the SAME THING as uploading your very own music files to your own server, or the server of your choice and accessing them as you choose. In effect, having your own "cloud". I have a web site. As part of the deal, I get unlimited server space and bandwidth. Presently have probably 80 gigs of mp3's there (all of my own creation, no music company stuff) but I could easily upload hundreds of gigs of music there, and have access whenever and where ever I want it, at no cost to me. Of course I don't have a spiffy user interface to facilitate easy retrieval and organizing like iTunes, etc. But still, I could do it easily enough. So could all of you.

    This is just another way to get you to pay to listen to music you already own. Except for very specialized situations, I just don't see a need for it.




    leonardo dicaprio younger years. with Leonardo DiCaprio and
  • with Leonardo DiCaprio and


  • Mischka07
    Sep 30, 07:01 PM
    Would it be out of line for me to suggest that AT&T should hire an outside agency to determine what the normal dropped call percentage is in each market, and then offer those markets a monthly discount on their rate equal to that percentage?

    I am in Southern California, Orange County area and would say my dropped call rate is around 20%. I spent some time in San Francisco in July and the service was horrible, my biggest problem was with data and the accuracy of maps ... which can be an issue when you're walking around a town like that and you've never been there.

    Stupid question, but they don't already use an outside agency for that?

    OT: I used to live in Aliso Viejo (OC) and had Cingular for my carrier. Over a 60 day period, the service got so bad in my house I could no longer make/receive phone calls. When I called CS to complain about the service, I was told that the contract I signed never states Cingular was required to provide cell service. I still don't know if that was true or not, but I dropped them that day and went with VZW.



    more...

    leonardo dicaprio younger years. leonardo dicaprio younger
  • leonardo dicaprio younger


  • astewart
    Nov 5, 12:50 AM
    The "Install VMWare Tools" botton is miss labled. It does not install them. What it does is replace your CDROM with an image file. Try thse steps:

    1) click "Install VMWare Tools"

    2) Go inside your guest OS and look at the CDROM drive.

    3) From Inside the OS install what you find on the CDROM.

    4) Re-boot the guest OS.

    Thanks Chris,
    What the problem was is that I had installed WindowsXP from and .iso image, so after the installation and everything was up and running, the D Drive "D:\" was still that .iso. I had to change the D drive to the actual DVD-ROM and the restart. Once that was done I had no problems installing the VMWare Tools.

    :o




    leonardo dicaprio younger years. Leonardo DiCaprio – Hollywood
  • Leonardo DiCaprio – Hollywood


  • TwoSocEmBoppers
    Mar 15, 02:56 AM
    I am going to head out to mine at around 8 AM when the mall opens and the apple store is opening 1 hour early so at 9 AM hopefully I can grab my 16GB 3G ATT.

    Brea is opening early?!



    more...

    leonardo dicaprio younger years. leonardo dicaprio younger
  • leonardo dicaprio younger


  • marksman
    Apr 22, 11:15 AM
    Apple doesn't compromise their overall vision and functionality for single features like all the other handset makers.

    So this is no surprise. This is why the individual iOS devices completely dominate their market segments.




    leonardo dicaprio younger years. leonardo dicaprio younger.
  • leonardo dicaprio younger.


  • daneoni
    Apr 13, 08:18 PM
    Couldn't care less.



    more...

    leonardo dicaprio younger years. leonardo dicaprio younger
  • leonardo dicaprio younger


  • ten-oak-druid
    Apr 13, 02:14 PM
    This is a false rumor. Absolutely no way will this happen.

    First of all Google failed with their TV.

    Second of all, it is much better to have the components separate. You can more easily pass the audio to a home entertainment system for surround sound. With a component built into the TV, you have cables going back in the other direction to the receiver. If audio and video both take the same path there is less change of them getting out of sync.




    leonardo dicaprio younger years. leonardo dicaprio younger
  • leonardo dicaprio younger


  • revelated
    May 1, 05:13 PM
    can anyone tell me why this market is so important? even at .99 cents a song the margins for the retailer can't be that much.

    I'm willing to bet that Amazon isn't doing things the way Apple is doing things. Amazon wasn't born yesterday. They have yet to do something that is an abject failure.


    The thing about Amazon's service that is appealing:




    leonardo dicaprio younger years. During the younger years of
  • During the younger years of


  • SPUY767
    Jul 25, 05:27 AM
    This says one thing. Apple is continuing to innovate, and that makes me smile. I would imagine that Apple is also a bit wary of carrion fowl such as creative who would swoop down on a market conquered by Apple, and demand a pittance because their own product was a failure.




    KnightWRX
    Apr 14, 06:21 PM
    Why don't you start reading things before making your incendiary comments?
    :rolleyes:

    Reading what ? Someone trying to say TB is an evolution of Fiber Channel when it does nothing of what Fiber Channel is actually used for ? Have you even ever used Fiber channel ?




    PlipPlop
    Apr 12, 05:20 PM
    Are you planning on pre-ordering your HTC sensation so you can avoid the masses of people lined up to buy it?

    Not sure if your being sarcastic but HTC are very hard to get around the launch time in the UK. Anyway yes, I am going to. The HTC Desire was almost impossible to get for about a month around release over here in the UK because of the massive demand for it.




    citi
    Apr 28, 04:16 PM
    It's not, actually. Every time a change in the phone comes out, the manufacturer has to make new cases to reach those new customers, necessitating new tools/molds/whatever (so more cost on their end). Any manufacturer would prefer that the same case worked for all iPhone4s because then they would only have to spend the manufacturing dollars once to reach a every iPhone4 customer. Plus, less confusion when people are buying cases.

    So what you are telling me is: An iPhone 4 comes out and I buy a case. Incase makes $20. An iPhone 5 comes out the same size and I don't buy a case because I have an old one and Incase makes $0. How is that better for Incase exactly?

    Manufacturing processes are the same for phone cases , candy bars, or screen prints on T-Shirts. The expense comes from the design and fabrication of the molds, not the manufacturing process. These original molds are already made so they can continue to make the old case at next to nothing. Once the new mold is made (the expensive part) it 's the same song.




    ucfgrad93
    Apr 30, 10:30 PM
    Ucfgrad93

    -aggie- is so called seer. I trust that. Chrmjenkins seems clean. I know I'm not. So it's him left. lbro as well, but I don't get that vibe from him.

    What vibe exactly am I not sending out? In all of the games I've played, I have never had a role other than plain ordinary villager. This game is no different.

    I agree that -aggie- and Chrmjenkins are most likely not wolves. Not sure about you or lbro. But you were awfully quick to single me out, which smacks of some hidden furriness on your part. So my vote is for you, jav6454.




    iEvolution
    Apr 29, 07:37 PM
    Paying less is not good. If you are a true Apple believer, you want to pay as much as possible so you can high five when Apple has record profits. It's not about the consumer, it's what's best for Apple.

    Wow some people here are incredibly close minded. Nothing comes good out of being dedicated to one brand, nothing. You don't get any perks from the company, you lose out on possible better competitor products, you lose money, you lose out on knowledge of other products, etc.

    Furthermore you are dedicated to a brand that is currently one of the most unethical companies out there, the only other company that compares is Sony. Don't get me wrong, I love the iPod line and I love the iTunes software (even if its bloated, management is 2nd to none for music), but the company does some shady things to save a few bucks, and go to great lengths to give the brand a positive name in the media (which includes banning certain individuals from their events if their reviews aren't what apple likes..iLounge 3rd generation shuffle for instance).

    BTW, Apple's primary profits come from hardware not the music store.

    I hate how slow Apple's servers on iTunes have been for the last couple years, definitely gonna have a look into amazon's store.



    Ni komentarjev:

    Objavite komentar