kirupa
06-21 03:04 PM
You interpreted it correctly and your entry flies very nicely under the guidelines! :)
wallpaper Rod Blagojevich Illinois
sam_hoosier
12-04 04:17 PM
Hi,
I have my EAD. Once I pass the 180 day limit for AC21 portability, can I move to a different state and a different job ? (provided salary and job specifications match )
Thanks,
Sam
Yes, you can :)
I have my EAD. Once I pass the 180 day limit for AC21 portability, can I move to a different state and a different job ? (provided salary and job specifications match )
Thanks,
Sam
Yes, you can :)
idontcare634
04-07 07:35 AM
Hi,
I am looking to switch employers. Although the job descriptions are pretty similar ( C coding, design, protocols etc.), my PERM was filed for Computer Software Engineer-Applications whereas the new one falls under Computer Software Engineer, Systems Software. Is this a risk during I-485 adjudication. Also my new salary is 50% higher than my original PERM salary (It has been almost 4 years since my original PERM).
Thanks.
I am looking to switch employers. Although the job descriptions are pretty similar ( C coding, design, protocols etc.), my PERM was filed for Computer Software Engineer-Applications whereas the new one falls under Computer Software Engineer, Systems Software. Is this a risk during I-485 adjudication. Also my new salary is 50% higher than my original PERM salary (It has been almost 4 years since my original PERM).
Thanks.
2011 On Tuesday Blagojevich called
skd
06-17 10:57 PM
I am also in same situation...
more...
bidme_786
01-02 12:46 PM
I got a soft luds on my previous H1B which was approbed in 2007 Feb and a Case Status Information email for I-140 which was approved in Dec - 2006.
seekerofpeace
09-07 08:43 PM
I tried a few times for scheduling infopass trying to get Boston which is closer to where I live. But I am getting Lawrence....I guess Boston office is flooded with appointments...Didn't know that Lawrence has a office too.
Will let you guys know if the meeting is of any help (which I doubt)...
Thanks,
SoP
Will let you guys know if the meeting is of any help (which I doubt)...
Thanks,
SoP
more...
rovingeye
07-26 09:08 PM
My case is not premium processing and the online status changed to "approval notice sent " for 4 days before the status changed to " document sent ". Its an I 140 and I heard that the mistake was restricted to PP cases . So I do not think that is the issue . Some one said it could be the last status on an approved I 140
Thanks anyway for the info
Thanks anyway for the info
2010 Now you know why Blagojevich
srikanth003
02-28 10:59 AM
Yeah, thinking of the same. Hopefully will make a decision soon. Thanks much for your timely answers. Greatly appreciated.
more...
vvenkat007
05-12 10:50 AM
Thanks for the info. Its very useful.
hair Rod Blagojevich banned from
sunnyark1
02-18 10:52 AM
Dear Attorneys, fellow forum members:
My situation is as follows:
I am currently working for a 3rd party Indian consulting firm (Company A). They are in possession of my H-1B visa. I came out of a project on January 29th (2 weeks back). My new project starts on Feb 25th. As I am paid on an hourly basis, I am not paid while I am on bench. As a result I don't have a pay stub for a period of 3 weeks.
Will this be a big problem in the future in terms of Green card processing?
The next question is:
In the time I have been on bench, I was interviewing with other companies as well and now I have a direct full time job offer from Company B (not through any consultant). This is an ideal situation in my opinion as my visa is held directly held with the employer under whom I work. Company B has started the process of filing for my H-1B transfer. It says it will take 8 to 10 days for the transfer to complete. Is this true? Also, can I start working for Company B before my visa is transferred or should I wait for the transfer to complete and keep working on the new project I have with Company A in the meantime (see above)?
I appreciate your help and feedback in this regard, as I don't know much about the legal process.
Thank you!
My situation is as follows:
I am currently working for a 3rd party Indian consulting firm (Company A). They are in possession of my H-1B visa. I came out of a project on January 29th (2 weeks back). My new project starts on Feb 25th. As I am paid on an hourly basis, I am not paid while I am on bench. As a result I don't have a pay stub for a period of 3 weeks.
Will this be a big problem in the future in terms of Green card processing?
The next question is:
In the time I have been on bench, I was interviewing with other companies as well and now I have a direct full time job offer from Company B (not through any consultant). This is an ideal situation in my opinion as my visa is held directly held with the employer under whom I work. Company B has started the process of filing for my H-1B transfer. It says it will take 8 to 10 days for the transfer to complete. Is this true? Also, can I start working for Company B before my visa is transferred or should I wait for the transfer to complete and keep working on the new project I have with Company A in the meantime (see above)?
I appreciate your help and feedback in this regard, as I don't know much about the legal process.
Thank you!
more...
sgudge
02-13 06:04 PM
ya i know exactly what you want to say , its easy for them follow the pattern.
maybe its best that 1 year i go to visit her and 1 year i call her over here .
:-)
maybe its best that 1 year i go to visit her and 1 year i call her over here .
:-)
hot Rod Blagojevich arrives at the
shivapb80
12-27 06:59 PM
they will not straightforward deny it...they will send you an RFE requesting proof that you were in legal status during that time. at that time - i am not sure how - but your employer will have to prove that your start date is in fact in january 2007.
i am pretty sure that is the course of action as i recall reading a couple of cases like that and i think atleast one of those cases was a similar case and the other was related to 245(i) - i hope i get that right.
i am pretty sure that is the course of action as i recall reading a couple of cases like that and i think atleast one of those cases was a similar case and the other was related to 245(i) - i hope i get that right.
more...
house In This Photo: Rod Blagojevich
idark
06-24 07:05 AM
Halfdog
It really doesnt fit in anywhere lol - But I can experiment a bit see what I can come up with. Can I resubmit my entry?
It really doesnt fit in anywhere lol - But I can experiment a bit see what I can come up with. Can I resubmit my entry?
tattoo In This Photo: Rod Blagojevich
pappu
10-16 12:43 PM
If you are suffering from Namechecks and have a compelling story, pls post in brief on this thread. We will use your stories while speaking with lawmakers and reporters. You may also be asked to speak to the media. Please make sure your profile is complete. No anonymous members please.
more...
pictures Rod Blagojevich, arrives at
smuggymba
05-12 09:38 PM
I am in the same boat, so can we use PD and I-140 from employer A even through my employment and H1B are not with Employer for a few months?
not sure if I understand your question correctly.
not sure if I understand your question correctly.
dresses Blagojevich Sings Elvis
indian
12-14 03:16 PM
Well, the 109th congress already passed part-I of the whole process: changing the US laws to allow special exception for India.
Once the President signs this, they have to negotiate the so called "123 agreement" that is a bilateral *binding* agreement between US and India. It will again have to be approved by congress.
I don't think anyone here knows how long will it take for the "123 agreement" to be concluded and presented to congress for approval. But once it does, expect desi resources on capitol hill to be again busy with it as their top priority. And that would shut us out for the period this stuff is pending in congress.
So what I am saying is that the window between now and when the "123 agreement" shows up in congress for approval is important and we should not miss it. At the very least we should be aware that this is coming and plan accordingly.
Indian.
Once the President signs this, they have to negotiate the so called "123 agreement" that is a bilateral *binding* agreement between US and India. It will again have to be approved by congress.
I don't think anyone here knows how long will it take for the "123 agreement" to be concluded and presented to congress for approval. But once it does, expect desi resources on capitol hill to be again busy with it as their top priority. And that would shut us out for the period this stuff is pending in congress.
So what I am saying is that the window between now and when the "123 agreement" shows up in congress for approval is important and we should not miss it. At the very least we should be aware that this is coming and plan accordingly.
Indian.
more...
makeup New Obama-Blagojevich Pics
prk_stl
06-30 04:28 PM
Thanks. I am guessing the same.. but for my friend, his lawyer entered the Card valid start and end dates on the EAD card for this date field...
that is why I am looking for a confirmation.
that is why I am looking for a confirmation.
girlfriend Rod Blagojevich asked a judge…
Blog Feeds
12-18 09:50 AM
As a California immigration lawyer who files many asylum cases, I am used to thinking of a the United States as a place of refuge and to documenting the horrible country conditions of other countries. I have successfully represented applicants for asylum who feared staying in their countries because while serving in their countries' armies, they were harmed on account of their sexual orientation.
It is therefore rather surprising to come across a story of a U.S.soldier who is fleeing to Canada (http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/11/20/refugee-board-soldier-lesbian.html) because she fears harm in the U.S. Army on account of her sexual orientation. According to CBC news, U.S. Army Pte. Bethany Smith fled Canada in September 2007 from a U.S. Army base in Fort Campbell, Ky. She applied for refugee status in October 2007, saying that she was harassed and threatened by fellow soldiers over her sexual orientation and feared that her life would be in danger if she were deported and returned to the army. The Canadian authorities initially rejected in her claim in February 2009. However, on appeal, the Federal Court of Canada held that the refugee board must reconsider the case again because the Board made several mistakes in initially reviewing her claim.
The Federal Court's decision (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/Smith%20and%20the%20Minister%20of%20Citizenship%20 and%20Immigration.pdf)noted that the refugee board failed to fully consider the evidence pertaining to the situation of gays and lesbians in the U.S. Army to determine whether Pte. Smith could have availed herself of protection in the United States. The Federal Court also noted that the Board failed to determine whether Pte. Smith would be persecuted on account of her social group - as a lesbian in the U.S. Army if forced to return. There were other errors mentioned in the decision.
It is sad that the U.S. policy of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," is the basis of an asylum claim in Canada. Pt. Smith was only 19 years old when she fled to Canada. From everything I read, it appears that she wanted to serve in the U.S. Army and no real desire to leave the United States. At a time when we apparently need people to serve in the Armed Forces and in fact give non-citizens a way to immigrate to the United States faster for their service, it seems ridiculous that an American citizen should have to leave. It it is time to eliminate the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy.
More... (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/11/us_army_soldier_applies_for_as.html)
It is therefore rather surprising to come across a story of a U.S.soldier who is fleeing to Canada (http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/11/20/refugee-board-soldier-lesbian.html) because she fears harm in the U.S. Army on account of her sexual orientation. According to CBC news, U.S. Army Pte. Bethany Smith fled Canada in September 2007 from a U.S. Army base in Fort Campbell, Ky. She applied for refugee status in October 2007, saying that she was harassed and threatened by fellow soldiers over her sexual orientation and feared that her life would be in danger if she were deported and returned to the army. The Canadian authorities initially rejected in her claim in February 2009. However, on appeal, the Federal Court of Canada held that the refugee board must reconsider the case again because the Board made several mistakes in initially reviewing her claim.
The Federal Court's decision (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/Smith%20and%20the%20Minister%20of%20Citizenship%20 and%20Immigration.pdf)noted that the refugee board failed to fully consider the evidence pertaining to the situation of gays and lesbians in the U.S. Army to determine whether Pte. Smith could have availed herself of protection in the United States. The Federal Court also noted that the Board failed to determine whether Pte. Smith would be persecuted on account of her social group - as a lesbian in the U.S. Army if forced to return. There were other errors mentioned in the decision.
It is sad that the U.S. policy of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," is the basis of an asylum claim in Canada. Pt. Smith was only 19 years old when she fled to Canada. From everything I read, it appears that she wanted to serve in the U.S. Army and no real desire to leave the United States. At a time when we apparently need people to serve in the Armed Forces and in fact give non-citizens a way to immigrate to the United States faster for their service, it seems ridiculous that an American citizen should have to leave. It it is time to eliminate the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy.
More... (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/11/us_army_soldier_applies_for_as.html)
hairstyles Rod Blagojevich speaks during
bb8185
07-22 07:00 PM
My attorney has asked for the I-485 to be printed:
double sided with Flip to Top option.
Did anyone else do the same?
My lawyer did 'flip to top' aswell.
double sided with Flip to Top option.
Did anyone else do the same?
My lawyer did 'flip to top' aswell.
ashwaghoshk
10-24 02:06 PM
A receipt of notice is generated immediately. As soon as your application reaches the USCIS ofice they generate the receipt of notice and post mail it to the attorney. It takes 2-3 days for the mail to reach your attorney so we can assume that the total time to get the receipt of notice from the day it was filed should not be greater than 4-5 days.
meridiani.planum
05-09 11:33 PM
With the possiblity of the annual spillover coming up soon, wanted a quick poll to see the upcoming PD distribution within the IV community. EB2-India and waiting for adjudication only please (we can start another one for EB3-I & ROW)
Ni komentarjev:
Objavite komentar